Charged with a CRIME?
Do not panic. I can help!
Request a Free Consultation
Being charged with a crime does not mean you have to be convicted
Criminal charges filed against you will change your life. However, this incident does not define you or your life! Remember you are innocent until proven guilty. When facing a legal problem, many people don’t know where to turn. Clearly people realize many lawyers practice criminal law and you have undoubtedly received letters advertising that they can do anything and everything! The real questions you should ask are;
- Do I need a Criminal Defense Specialist?
- Can I trust the lawyer in the advertisement?
- What is important when hiring a lawyer?
These questions are all answered the same way – hire a lawyer with training and experience in your type of case. If it is a criminal defense or bodily injury case for you or a loved one, you are at the right place. YOU ARE NOT ALONE. We have been through this before and will help you.
Experience | Preparation | Strategy
Our Attorneys have experience as both Prosecuting and Defense Attorneys. As former Assistant District Attorneys, we handled hundreds of criminal cases and have worked with defense attorneys to find solutions. As defense attorneys, we will put that experience to work for you. This has given our Attorneys the opportunity to learn about every different type of criminal defense and sharpen our ability as trial lawyers. Our lawyers know the ins and outs of Pennsylvania and New Jersey criminal law. This means that no matter what criminal charge you are facing, our Attorneys have the knowledge and skillset to confidently represent you. Our team of attorneys and staff members are dedicated to finding the best criminal defense for your case, even if that means long hours of preparation to come up with creative defenses.
Stages to your case
Step 1: The Arrest
Probable Cause
After the investigation, Law enforcement is going to have to decide whether to send the case to the prosecutor. Their only concern is whether there is “probable cause” that you committed a crime. A witness who says you committed a crime is usually enough to warrant turning the charges over to the prosecutor.
The prosecutor will then take the case and review it. They will review the police officer’s probable cause affidavit, and their review will rarely go further than that. The prosecutor then files a complaint, along with the probable cause affidavit, with the court. He swears to the contents of the complaint, and the judge makes a probable cause finding.
The Warrant
Often the judge will then issue a warrant for the defendant’s arrest. Sometimes they will issue a summons (an order allowing you to freely appear in court). However, with a felony charge, it is almost always a warrant for arrest. The police execute the warrant by arresting you and booking you into the jail.
If you learn of the warrant before the police arrest you, you can go and turn himself in. Doing this will be to your advantage if the court has not set a bond. You can use that fact to persuade the judge you are not a flight risk. This may help you get a lower bond.
Bonding Out
Sometimes the judge will set a bond with the warrant. If you can afford to bond out you will post the bond and leave immediately. Sometimes the judge will not set a bond. In that event, you will have to stay the night in the jail. The court will set bond the next day at the arraignment.
Keep in mind, if you check into jail on a Friday afternoon, you will be sitting in the jail until Monday. So if you are turning yourself in on a warrant, make sure you turn yourself in Sunday-Thursday.
Step 2: Arraignment (Initial Appearance)
The court will next set the case for an arraignment. You have a right to an arraignment within 24 hours of the police arresting you. However, the court excludes, Saturdays, Sundays, and Holidays.
At the arraignment, Court will read the allegations against you. The Court will also tell you your rights. The court will advise you of the following rights:
- To Remain Silent.
- To Know the Charges Against Him.
- To Bail.
- To An Attorney.
- To a Preliminary Hearing.
- To Communicate with His Lawyer and Immediate Family.
- To have the Complaint Read in Open Court. (this right is almost always waived by the defendant)
Bond Argument
The issue of bond is the most pressing concern at the initial appearance. Many defendants are still in custody and wish to get out. The judge has two major concerns when setting bail. First, the probability that the defendant will make his future court appearances. And second, the risk the defendant poses to the community. The court has other concerns, but most of them relate to these two concerns.
I will attempt to provide satisfactory evidence, facts, and argument to the judge to convince the judge that the defendant will be at his court hearings and that he does not pose a significant risk to the community.
One thing to keep in mind (and this is the most maddening aspect of these hearings), everything is free-game during a bond hearing, all your past record (even juvenile record), other allegations against you, your personal life, etc. Often the prosecutors will make mistakes in presenting your record to the court. However, at this stage, there is little your attorney can do to correct those mistakes.
Step 3: The Preliminary Hearing (or Grand Jury Indictment)
At this time in the proceedings, your case is still in magistrate court, and a magistrate judge still presides over the case. He has the responsibility of sending the case to district court. Before the court can do that, it must find substantial evidence that the defendant committed a crime.
In some cases, it will be a grand jury that makes those findings. A grand jury is a group of jurors that hear cases presented by the State. They must make the same findings that the magistrate must make. The prosecuting attorney is the one who decides whether to convene a grand jury or to take the case to a preliminary hearing.
These hearings are not a trial.
Some defendants look at these hearings as mini-trials, but they are quite different from a trial. The standard of proof is much lower, the prosecutor will not need to prove their case ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ like they would for a jury trial. The judge will not weigh the evidence as much as he will look to see whether the evidence that the State presents satisfies the elements of the charge.
A grand jury proceeding does not even have a defendant or his attorney present for the proceedings (these are what in call “ex parte” hearings). Consequently, you will not have an opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses that testify before the Grand Jury, nor will you have an opportunity to call your own witnesses. On the other hand, at a preliminary hearing, you will have the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses, and to call your own witnesses. If a grand jury or a judge determines that there is substantial evidence to move forward, then the case will “bound over” to the district court.
On the other hand, at a preliminary hearing, you will have the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses, and to call your own witnesses. If a grand jury or a judge determines that there is substantial evidence to move forward, then the case will “bound over” to the district court.
A preliminary hearing is not always necessary.
The court doesn’t require a hearing to send the case to district court. If the defendant waives the hearing, the case can go to the district court without a hearing.
Often the prosecutor will attempt a resolution of the case at the preliminary hearing stage. If the Defendant wants to take advantage of the offer, then the court will require the defendant to “waive” the preliminary hearing. What this means is the Defendant agrees that he wants to take advantage of the State’s offer, and is willing to relieve them of their duty to present their evidence to the magistrate judge.
Sometimes it is a good idea to waive your preliminary hearing, and sometimes it is not. This will be a strategic decision. Sometimes it is a good idea to get the witnesses statement on the record. Other times it is not. Sometimes there is nothing to lose, sometimes there is everything to lose. Whether to have a preliminary hearing will be a decision that you will have to make with the advice of your attorney.
Step 4: The District Court Arraignment (Entry of Plea)
After the magistrate sends the case to district court, the court will set the matter for an arraignment. The court will assign a district judge and he (or she) will typically be the judge for the remaining proceedings. At this hearing, the judge will present the defendant with an “information.” An information is similar to a complaint, only that an ‘information’ is what they call the charging document in district court. Again the defendant will have his rights read to him, and advised of the possible consequences of pleading guilty to the charge.
The Plea
The defendant will have an opportunity to enter his plea. He will have three options, plead guilty, plead not guilty, or ask for a continuance. It is very common at this stage for your attorney to request a set over to attempt to resolve the case with the state. Even if the defendant already received an offer in magistrate court, his lawyer can continue to negotiate with the prosecutor in district court to get a better deal.
If the defendant pleads guilty, then the court will set the case for sentencing. If he pleads not guilty, then the court will set the case for a pretrial conference and a jury trial. Finally, if he asks for a continuance, then the court will set the case over for an entry of plea.
Step 5: Time between the Entry of Plea, and the Pretrial Conference/Pretrial Conference
If the Defendant pleads not guilty, then the time between the not guilty plea and pretrial conference is extremely important. This is the time in which a complete disclosure of the evidence the state has in its possession needs to be completed. The Defendant (and his counsel) should be doing a thorough investigation themselves. A thorough analysis of the discovery needs to be done early on so that any motions that have deadlines attached to them can be made before the deadline. Hearings to orally argue the motions need to be set.
By the time of the pretrial conference, the defendant and his attorney need to have a good idea what the theory of the case is, the pretrial motions that need to be argued, or set for a hearing for the attorneys to argue later.
The Pretrial Conference
The pretrial conference is the hearing the judge sets so that he can determine whether the parties are ready to go to trial. At this hearing, he will check to make sure that the attorneys have complied with all of the Court’s pretrial orders. If he set a discovery deadline, he will check to make sure that disclosures have been timely, and whether there are any outstanding issues regarding discovery. Sometimes the prosecutor and defense attorney resolve the case at this point.
Step 6: Trial (Jury or Bench Trial)/Presentence/Sentencing)
If the case remains unresolved up to this stage, then it will go to a trial. At the trial the prosecutor has the burden to prove each element of the crime. The degree to which the prosecutor must prove these facts is “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
At the trial, the defendant is allowed to subpoena his or her own witnesses. The defendant is allowed to cross-examine the state’s witnesses. In some cases, he will be allowed to call his or her own expert witnesses to the trial, to testify as to some issue the jury may not be able to otherwise understand without the assistance of the expert. Additionally, he will be allowed to enter any evidence, physical or otherwise, that may have a bearing on his innocence.
Jury Trial vs. Bench Trial
A trial can take two forms, either a jury trial or a bench trial. The only difference between a jury trial, and a bench trial, is that in a bench trial, the judge is the finder of fact. Every defendant has a right to a jury trial, but if the defendant so chooses, he can waive the jury trial and have the judge decide the case.
Jury Trial
A jury trial is a trial where twelve people are chosen, through a process known as “voir dire” or “jury selection”, to sit as “fact-finders” on the case. The attorneys present the facts to the twelve “fact-finders” and they determine which facts they believe are true and whether those facts fulfill all the elements of the crime that the State charged the defendant with.
Ultimately the court will ask the jury to determine whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. Either determination will need to be a unanimous decision. If the jury is unable to come to a unanimous decision, then the jury is a “hung jury” and the judge declares a mistrial. The state is then free to retry the case if they so choose.
Sentencing
Sentencing is the final stage of the court proceedings.
Minimum and Maximum Penalties
All felonies have a ‘maximum punishment’. The court cannot sentence you to more than the maximum penalty. Some felonies have a ‘mandatory minimum’ sentence. The court cannot sentence you to a sentence less than the mandatory minimum. In state court in Idaho, the judge is given great latitude in fashioning a sentence for a defendant. If there is a mandatory minimum, the judge can sentence anywhere from the minimum to the maximum penalty. The judge considers mitigating and aggravating factors in the case. For example, if this is the offender’s first conviction, the judge may be inclined to stay on the lighter side of sentencing, considering all other factors of course.
Sentencing Factors
There are several factors that a judge will consider when sentencing.
- The criminal history of the defendant.
- How much involvement this particular defendant had in the crime.
- Whether the defendant was under any type of duress or unusual stress.
- If the victim was in fact hurt and how badly.
- Has the defendant accepted personal responsibility for his or her actions?
- Whether the defendant has demonstrated remorse and regrets his or her actions, etc.
- Is the defendant is susceptible to rehabilitation?
- Does the defendant pose a risk to society?
- The general deterrence the sentence will have on society’s future conduct.
- The specific deterrence the sentence will have on the defendant’s future conduct.
The Penalty
Possible penalties for felony charges can be prison sentences, monetary fines, treatment programs, community supervision, restitution to the victim, etc. For some felonies, if the defendant has a clean record, the judge will entertain the possibility of a withheld judgment.
Criminal Areas of Focus
Offenses Against Property
Offenses Against Property
If you have been accused of one of the enumerated Offenses against Property, you could be facing a victim in court, who is out for your blood. Here is where our experience is paramount, if charged, let alone convicted of an Offense against Property the perception other people may have could lead to preventing you from finding a well-paying job, further education, professional licenses, not to mention possible incarceration. We, at the Rudolph Law Firm, have handled complicated cases like this before. Representative matters include;
- Arson
- Embezzlement
- Burglary
- Theft by Unlawful Taking
- Receiving Stolen Property
- Bad Checks
- Retail Theft
- Forgery
- Fraud
- Criminal Mischief
- Theft from a Vehicle
- Theft of Services
- Theft of a Vehicle
- Government Assistance Fraud
- Criminal Trespass
- Defiant Trespass
- Theft by Deception
- Access Device Fraud
- Identity Theft
Our attorneys have worked on these cases, know the required elements of proof the prosecution has to show, know the defenses to the charges. We, at The Rudolph Law Firm stand ready to consult with you about your defense and stand up for you in court when no one else will.
Offenses Involving Danger to a Person
Offenses Involving Danger to a Person
Sometimes discussions become arguments that get out of hand. When this happens actions of one or more people may become physical, where these acts can rise to the extent that criminal charges have been filed for:
- Homicide
- Manslaughter
- Aggravated Assault
- Simple Assault
- Recklessly Endangering Another Person (REAP)
- Terroristic Threats
- Harassment
- Stalking
- Ethnic Intimidation
- Kidnapping
- Corruption of Minors
- Rape
- Involuntary Sexual Intercourse
- Sexual Assault
- Indecent Assault
- False Imprisonment
Whether you situation began as a schoolyard fight, domestic matter, bar fight, or countless other circumstances, we have found that an aggressive defense to these charges is often a good idea, because sometimes the victim of the initial aggression is often arrested too. By knowing how the court system works, we can step in ready to defend you in your assault case and make sure you are not a victim twice. There are certain defenses as a matter of law, which must be investigated and handled properly in order to have a chance at success!
Offenses Against the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device, and Cosmetic Act
Offenses Against the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device, and Cosmetic Act
Many changes to laws concerning controlled substances have occurred within the last few years, whether in Pennsylvania, where marijuana is permitted for medical use or New Jersey, where marijuana is permitted for medical and recreational use. Laws concerning the use, possession, transportation, and delivery have remained and persons continue to be charged. Typically, the controlled substances may involve; marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamine, heroin, and fentanyl. Our Attorneys have been tasked with investigating defending and matters such as:
- Possession of a Controlled Substance
- Possession with the Intent to Deliver
- Possession of Paraphernalia
- Sale of Paraphernalia
Offenses Against the Pubic
Offenses Against the Pubic
Laws concerning the purchase, sale, use, and possession of Firearms are consistently being argued in the news, during political campaigns, and the legislature. We a consistent record of crafting defense strategies whereby a person may not lose their right to arms under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. Charges commonly include:
- Persons not to possess firearms
- Firearms not to be carried without a license
- Possession of Instrument of Crime
- Prohibited Offensive Weapons
- Possession of Weapon on School Property
- Possession of Weapon
Contact us for a Complimentary Strategy Session
At our initial strategy session, you will receive the following tools to prepared specifically for you;
- Factual summary 🡪 based upon your recollection and the Criminal Complaint.
- Dissection of legal issues 🡪 breakdown of the charges and elements.
- Potential Defenses and/or legal issues to be raised on your behalf.
- A list of potential outcomes based upon the current matter and your background.
We know the law, the system, and how to get results
If you don’t know where to turn to build your criminal defense, please look through the free content on this website and contact us to discuss your case.
We have worked with matters involving this police department, prosecutor’s office, and Courtrooms involving your matter. Let our experience dealing with criminal charges and help get your life back to normal.
Selected Testimonials
“Josh was extremely prompt in his replies and got me an answer to my question/concerns within less than a day. Very professional and easy to speak with. Would absolutely consult with him in the future on any other matters.”
“I found Josh Rudolph by chance simply from opening up a letter I received in the mail and he happened to be the first envelope from a bunch of law firms. Well I was lucky. He was not only amazing at his job and competent, he was comforting to me when I was stressed, he went the extra mile by even coming out to visit me as a means of support offering friendly advice. I was extremely happy with the outcome of my case as well, he got the best possible outcome for me in my DUI case, and he even had a good rapport with the judges. I recommend his services 100%.”
“Josh , goes beyond any lawyer I have ever met . He uses many contacts from his various positions in the judicial system to get the job done . His fairness with rates and hours is second to none . Many times I was fearful of a very large bill, but at the end of the day he was very fair with his time and mine as well . I would never go to anyone else for any cases that I may have in the future .”